|
Behavioural psychologists set out to prove or disprove this gender theory by measuring passive/ aggressive tendencies. There were a lot of dodgy psychological experiments performed.
Animal psychologists fed chickens male hormones and measured the increased peck rate. Other psychologists worked with small babies. It was found for example, that when a researcher blew on the baby's face while it was lying in the pram, a girl baby would turn over and go back to sleep, whereas a boy baby would react in a more belligerent manner, perhaps giving the psychologist a whack with his rattle.
Psychologists applied a standard statistical test (5% significance level) to ‘prove' the theory, even though they had a minimal knowledge of statistics.
However, it was found that aggressive/ passive behaviour is much more influenced by sexual stereotyping.
In an experiment conducted with a small boy aged about 3 years old, a female carer was told to look after him. When he was dressed as a boy, the carer played more active/ rougher games, such as kicking a ball, with him. When the same boy was dressed as a girl, a carer sat the ‘girl' on her lap and used a doll to play with ‘her'.
This illustrates that a boy is ‘conditioned' to be aggressive, and a girl is ‘conditioned' to be passive.
So is there any ‘truth' in the left/ right brain theory and the ‘gender theory'?
In my experience in mathematics education as a teacher, I've found that boys tend to solve mathematical problems in a more aggressive manner, and will try different approaches if one method fails. Girls tend to be more passive in their problem solving. Quite often a girl will start to use the correct method, but abandon her solution through a lack of confidence when the going gets slightly more difficult.
I tend to use intuition quite a lot to solve mathematical problems, especially the more difficult ones. That's on the right side of the brain I think?

|